<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joomla vs. Drupal</title>
	<link>http://www.osskins.com/main/uncategorized/joomla-vs-drupal/2007/10/29</link>
	<description>Showcasing the most recent templates for Wordpress, Joomla, Drupal and other open source CMS.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: B.L. Pitt</title>
		<link>http://www.osskins.com/main/uncategorized/joomla-vs-drupal/2007/10/29#comment-2449</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.osskins.com/main/uncategorized/joomla-vs-drupal/2007/10/29#comment-2449</guid>
					<description>While Drupal has a very powerful system, I've found Joomla development to be a lot more systematic. It is also easier to train resources to work on large Joomla deployments. Joomla seems to be more inviting to our freshers too as the conventional admin section makes it seem 'familiar'. On the above counts, Drupal projects have just crumbled. Drupal also has some way to go before having an extension library like the one available for Joomla.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Drupal has a very powerful system, I&#8217;ve found Joomla development to be a lot more systematic. It is also easier to train resources to work on large Joomla deployments. Joomla seems to be more inviting to our freshers too as the conventional admin section makes it seem &#8216;familiar&#8217;. On the above counts, Drupal projects have just crumbled. Drupal also has some way to go before having an extension library like the one available for Joomla.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
